Just potential imo.My explanation this morning:
Tropical moisture from the Indian Ocean surges down and meets up with a strong front. This should form the trifecta of moisture, instability and cold air, perfect for snow. A centre of low pressure should form and become cut off from the westerly airflow (that wants to move our weather systems through quickly). This is even better for snow, as its slow-moving and can deliver snow for longer.
The slow movement does mean there is time for the atmosphere to warm up a bit, on Monday and Tuesday (but not like we’ve seen recently). This system will be carrying plenty of cold air and plenty of moisture, so the initial rain will quickly change to snow. I’d expect rain to develop late Tuesday, and turn to HEAVY SNOW during Wednesday. Then, front after front should be able to move through, and deliver EVEN MORE SNOW. This has the potential to add up to a big snowfall next week (more than 50cm), but most of it above 1600 metres.
I guess we need a primer Verm. Why is tropopause adiabatic 1000 hPa temperature (very roughly tropopause height) a good measure to look at? Any special things we should look for, beyond the general "LWT" shape? Sure does makes a nice plot...
(Did you study with Hakim?)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
IMO the system is not nearly as cold (as we said yesterday), yet there's plenty of moisture.
Nothing much on the 22nd but slowly building Thursday and Friday. Temps will be marginal but good above 1600m. There a hint of a wandering cold pool on GFS which might help 500 hPas of -25 would see a lower now level.
Might be suitable for NSW, but this isnt going to start the season at Buller and VIC based on the current charts. But remember it was just a couple of days ago some people were talking 700-800m snow level for these systems...
At the top. Where it should be.
Where is OZ on this CHART?
On the flip side, it is GFS.Fairly broad area of decent tot tots as well. Value of 55's with a nice hook at 300 over Victoria @144 hrs via GFS.
AXS isn't working for me at 500On the flip side, it is GFS.
My explanation this morning:
Tropical moisture from the Indian Ocean surges down and meets up with a strong front. This should form the trifecta of moisture, instability and cold air, perfect for snow. A centre of low pressure should form and become cut off from the westerly airflow (that wants to move our weather systems through quickly). This is even better for snow, as its slow-moving and can deliver snow for longer.
The slow movement does mean there is time for the atmosphere to warm up a bit, on Monday and Tuesday (but not like we’ve seen recently). This system will be carrying plenty of cold air and plenty of moisture, so the initial rain will quickly change to snow. I’d expect rain to develop late Tuesday, and turn to HEAVY SNOW during Wednesday. Then, front after front should be able to move through, and deliver EVEN MORE SNOW. This has the potential to add up to a big snowfall next week (more than 50cm), but most of it above 1600 metres.
I like how it's so digestible
On the flip side, it is GFS.
well unlike you , I like to goto the snowYou really want this to happen dont you Donza?
4 day rule
That would be a upgrade people
![]()
They will be what EC showed this morning IMOWho is game and capable of creating (and posting) the next 2 charts? (I'm neither)
well nah.They will be what EC showed this morning IMO
850hpa charts don't really show Cold poolsAnd with the death of the low. The cold air being drawn in quite clearly when the low is lowest, doesn't hook around and we end up with this cold pool lagging behind.
![]()
No, next week has no correlation (in any way) to what happened last week.In conclusion. I'm concerned about the cold pool arriving too late, just as it did this week.
C'mon astro it's a totally different set upIn conclusion. I'm concerned about the cold pool arriving too late, just as it did this week.
Toatally agree they are different systems. I'm only worried that the Cold Air and Moisture don't sync.C'mon astro it's a totally different set up