Last year I did a review comparing falls creek with hotham for those people perhaps new to the snow who were tossing up between the two.
A week ago I spent my first week in nz. A lot of people try to work out whether it is worth going to nz for a week or so or just spending time at a different resort in Australia. Here are my thoughts (I only went to cardrona and treble cone) on my experience:
1. Ease of access. Australia on-snow>nz off snow>>>>Australia off snow. Nz is all driving up to the snow each day and up the hills on dirt roads which can get muddy. The drive up is not as difficult as say to driving up hotham each day but still makes it a bit of a hassle to drive each day and change etc. this is very important for those with kids etc where driving up each day might be an important consideration. I didn’t mind it as the drive isn’t that long.
2. Terrain – I have two words for those who want challenging terrain. “treble coneâ€. This is a serious mountain and not for beginners. If you have beginners with you then don’t even consider treble cone. A blue run at falls creek or even hotham is not the equivalent of a blue run at tc !
Cardrona is a bit like falls creek. If you are considering cardrona only and the snow is the same in aust or nz then I would not bother spending the hassle to just go to cardrona. I didn’t go to the others in nz south island.
3. Restaurants etc – nz seems to be more about skiing because that is what people do there and not so much the resort style that aust has. Result – lots of people bring their own food and no one cares – even in the cafes if they eat their byo there particularly at treble cone. Still there are cafes and restaurants but not many because it isn’t what skiing appears to be about. Especially at treble cone – one café which has some really good food but for the most part people byo I think. Funnily enough though the food is better on mountain at nz than at the Australian resorts.
4. Nz has an international feel. There are people from everywhere. All the staff are british backpackers. You feel you are on an international holiday and it is great. Australia in midweek can be about Australians going to the snow for their yearly ski trip (the corollary of this is that there are fewer crowds see below). Nz in winter is just about skiing because that is what you do.
5. Crowds. In Australia during mid week it is quiet. I think it is because people mightn’t prefer to spend a whole week in an Australian resort and will go elsewhere. In NZ Cardrona midweek was surprisingly packed – people spending 1 or 2 weeks in the snow will choose nz not Australia and it shows. Long queues.
6. Snow level. It wasn’t very good the week I went but still skiable. In Australia I have found as soon as it gets marginal it is hopeless (falls creek seems to hold up though).
7. Scenery. Nz is Magnificent. You could be in the alps. Aust isn’t as spectacular but you are skiing in the trees in Australia and that is quite nice – you don’t get that in nz and it can also mean you are exposed to the weather. Even if the weather isn’t so good in aust you can get some protection.
8. Après ski. I stayed in Wanaka which is good and magnificent locale. Queenstown is a tourist honeypot and packed and rowdy and full of businesses touting for tourist dollars not just skiers. The main plus for nz is the variety of things to do if you don’t want to ski. Plenty. But if you want to just finish skiing and go off to a restaurant without hassle then Australian resorts on-snow are your best bets .
9. Costs. Nz is cheaper. The tickets are not expensive, again it comes back to the less “resorty†set up of the place and so they don’t charge as much. No mountain entry fee. But once you add up all the additional bits and pieces eg flights, getting to airport, car parking at airport or taxi, hire car, etc etc etc then really it will end up being a bit more – but not much more - to go to nz. Mightnt be if you are spending more than 1 week.
10. Time. this is something that hit me and is a consideration. Yes ok it is only 3 hours away by flying but once you take into account check in times, getting to airport, getting from airport, flight connections (if applicable), drive at other end etc etc you lose days that you otherwise would have spent skiing or just “awayâ€. In aust your seven days off can be Friday night (if really keen) to Sunday afternoon all at the snow. This will not happen if going to nz unless really lucky or possibly expensive (i.e fly to Queenstown direct) with your flights. Bank on having at least 1 day less than you otherwise would in aust.
11. Experience. I have had a tough year at work and needed a break. nz is good because you are away from it all. It feels like (well it is) an international holiday. I came back exhausted but refreshed because it was international flights, duty free, new things to see, the international feel of the ski areas and all of those things that make you feel like you have got away. That would not have happened if I had decided to go to an aust resort.
12. Atmosphere. Australian resorts seem to be so much more packaged and marketed as a commercial product – whether it is noise adrenaline advertising everywhere music everywhere and rowdy (buller and hotham) or cosy, friendly, warm fuzzy holiday places (eg falls creek). NZ “resorts†feel more like ski areas and it is much less gung ho and attitude, especially the kind of toxic behaviour you get at buller. Treble cone soon does away with those who have more attitude than skill. Cardrona is a more intermediate friendly mountain, a bit like falls creek but doesn’t push it too much. It is just another place to ski !
On balance, if the snow is the same, I would choose NZ. But if you are lowish intermediate, beginner, or just want to have a week “in the snow†or have a lot of people (eg kids!) then the Australian resorts where you are in the snow all the time, at the resort, ease of access, not driving every day etc, are the go.