Bugski said:2) What the hell is with the IMO in every post, Has everyone lost their marbles since I was away?
Bugski said:Two things.
1) This will be awesome
2) What the hell is with the IMO in every post, Has everyone lost their marbles since I was away?
Gerg said:Scratchy pessimist (IMO). Ensemble is divergent == wait...
Bugski said:Most of the public wouldn't know what IMO stood for. The safest course is always to follow whatever Sandy, WJ or Conservative Forecaster say anyway, if they are still around. Verm's not bad either.
Katanga said:If the leading High is squeezed south again, it would lead to a slowing of this system as the models seem to have shown over the last few days and it could force the best parts SE before they hit the Alps.
Fetch does look good. Looks open to further frontal progression given the position of trailing high. Like.Hermon said:Latest ACCESS-G looks sweet IMO. Very cold temps and sustained Southwesterlies with a deep fetch for several days. The synoptic almost looks like August 10 2005... IMO.